ضغط الصور

ضغط الصور في المتصفح ومقارنة النتيجة قبل وبعد.

ضبط الجودة

قبل/بعد المقارنة

تنزيل الملف

جارٍ تحميل الأداة...

يتم تجهيز مساحة العمل وعناصر التحكم لهذه الأداة.

What this page is good for

This page is useful when an image is visually acceptable but still too heavy for upload, email, sharing, or a content-management workflow.

It helps you reduce transfer cost and page weight while keeping a visible before-and-after check close to the export step.

Good fit use cases

Shrink hero images, article uploads, or form attachments before publishing them online.
Reduce the size of screenshots or illustrations so they are easier to send in chat or email.
Test a quick quality tradeoff before opening a larger image-editing workflow.

A practical way to use it

Load the image you want to optimize and decide whether the goal is lighter sharing, faster loading, or easier upload.
Adjust compression settings while comparing visual changes against the original.
Export only after checking the spots where compression artifacts would matter most.

Practical notes

Compression is easier to judge when you know the destination first, because email, mobile web, and print all tolerate different quality tradeoffs.

Images with text, screenshots, and sharp UI edges usually need a more careful quality check than soft photos.

Common questions

Will the image always look exactly the same after compression?

Not always. Compression is a tradeoff between file size and visible quality, so it is worth checking text edges, fine detail, and flat-color areas before you publish the result.

What is this page good for?

It is useful before uploading to a CMS, form, email attachment, or share page when you want a file that loads faster and transfers more easily.

When should I use a fuller image workflow instead?

If the file is headed into print, brand delivery, or a tightly controlled production pipeline, finish the final export inside a more complete design workflow.